In the ever-changing patent wars, somedays you are the windshield and some days you are the bug. After coming up roses Thursday, Apple finds itself on the losing side against Samsung and Motorola.
An Australian court today dismissed Apple’s request to continue the country’s ban on Samsung’s Galaxy 10.1 tablet. The ruling by the Australian High Court means the South Korean company will be able to hawk its device during the all-important Christmas buying period.
In an ironic move, the court also ordered the Cupertino, Calif. tech giant pay legal costs. Conversely, on Thursday, a French court denied Samsung’s bid to ban the iPhone 4S, ruling the smartphone maker must pay Apple’s court costs. Apple and Samsung are engaged in courtroom brawls covering some 10 nations.
Apple suffered a second patent loss Friday, this time in Germany. That nation’s court ordered an injunction against the iPhone and iPads using 3G. Motorola claimed the Apple devices infringed on a European patent regarding the “Method for Performing a Countdown Function During a Mobile-originated Transfer for a Packet Radio System.” Patent expert Florian Mueller, writing at FOSS Patents, said the patent was ruled essential for the GPRS standard, a version of 3G used widely used in Europe.
The ruling comes after a German court sided with Motorola in an earlier default judgement against Apple. The default judgement was entered after Apple failed to respond to Motorola’s complaint. Today’s court decision actually carries a penalty compared to the essentially administrative default ruling.
Although the iPhone 4S was released after Motorola filed the German lawsuit, Mueller believes Apple’s newest iPhone would also contain the offending technology. However, the actual ruling mentions only the iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPad 3G and iPad 2 3G.
While Apple’s next step is unknown, one potential reaction could be for the company to modify its products to remove the patented technology. The company is expected to unveil a new iPhone and iPad in early 2012.
Similar Posts:- Apple Wins Samsung Tab Ban in Australia, Dooming Christmas Sales
- How Did Apple Get Samsung’s Phones Banned Across Europe? By Closing A Dutch Legal Loophole
- Apple Wins Permanent German Ban on Samsung Tablet
- Japan Becomes Latest Legal Battleground Between Apple and Samsung
- Australia Could Become an Android-Free Zone



The iPhone 4S is being hailed by pretty much everyone as a success these days, including a 

Apple will be able to continue selling the iPhone 4S in France unimpeded, according to a court decision on Thursday. The Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris has denied a request by Samsung to secure a preliminary injunction against the sale of the 4S.
AT&T 

The iPhone 4S is more beloved than its predecessor, the iPhone 4. The iPhone 4 also scored highly shortly after its introduction back in July 2010, but it fell short of the 4S’ lofty heights. The iPhone 4 satisfied 93 percent of respondents, with 72 percent reporting being “very satisfied” and 21 percent saying they were “somewhat satisfied.” The 4S had 77 percent of users report being “very satisfied” and 19 percent say they were “somewhat satisfied.”
Things that people didn’t like about the iPhone 4S are probably less of a surprise to those who have been following it in the news. No. 1 is that battery life is too short; 38 percent of respondents complained about this. Apple has been dealing with reports of compromised battery life on the 4S since its release, and it has issued one update already to attempt to address the problem. Despite the update, complaints persist, though ChangeWave found that it was a “very big problem” for only 8 percent of its survey respondents.
Another big complaint from users was the lack of 4G capability. I suppose that’s also to be expected, as carriers continue to ramp up their 4G networks and Android devices heavily market their LTE network compatibility. Still the issue doesn’t seem to have had much of an impact on users’ overall impression of their devices, and rumors suggest we will see